* Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-26 00:31]:
> Yes, no problem you can contact me. I am not a mips expert, so maybe
> it would be a good idea to keep Thiemo and Martin in the loop.
Thiemo's the expert you're looking for.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 05:18:17AM +1000, Kel Modderman wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Patch looks good, I'll get it in the madwifi(-old) package soon.
Thanks!
> However, for madiwfi(-ng), I hope we can fix this upstream. Can I
Well I don't really know what is madwifi(-ng). Is it already available
in
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 08:23:38PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
[snip]
> Ok, please find attached a new patch that uses mips1-{be,le}-elf for all
> kernels. Tested on R1 and R4400 CPU.
This one looks much better, thanks.
> As for 64-bit kernels, the MIPS-III binary does not work, as it is a
> 32-
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 05:59:14PM +, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 06:41:32PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
[snip]
Hmm, you select the hal.o file accordingly? Won't mips1-le-elf work
on both R1 and R2? Checking for R1/R2 doesn't seem ideal to m
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 05:59:14PM +, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 06:41:32PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> [snip]
> > >>Hmm, you select the hal.o file accordingly? Won't mips1-le-elf work
> > >>on both R1 and R2? Checking for R1/R2 doesn't seem ideal to me if it
> > >>can
Thiemo Seufer a écrit :
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 06:41:32PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
[snip]
Hmm, you select the hal.o file accordingly? Won't mips1-le-elf work
on both R1 and R2? Checking for R1/R2 doesn't seem ideal to me if it
can be avoided.
Thiemo, any comment?
At least for 32bit k
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 06:41:32PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
[snip]
> >>Hmm, you select the hal.o file accordingly? Won't mips1-le-elf work
> >>on both R1 and R2? Checking for R1/R2 doesn't seem ideal to me if it
> >>can be avoided.
> >>
> >>Thiemo, any comment?
> >
> >
> >At least for 32bit k
Thiemo Seufer a écrit :
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 11:34:50AM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-23 09:05]:
I was unable to build the kernel module on mipsel. The problem is that
1) The mipsisa32-be-elf version of hal.o is used on mipsel, which is
litt
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 11:34:50AM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-23 09:05]:
> > I was unable to build the kernel module on mipsel. The problem is that
> > 1) The mipsisa32-be-elf version of hal.o is used on mipsel, which is
> >little endian
> > 2
* Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-23 14:25]:
> >Hmm, you select the hal.o file accordingly? Won't mips1-le-elf work
> >on both R1 and R2? Checking for R1/R2 doesn't seem ideal to me if it
> >can be avoided.
>
> Well actually I don't know because I don't own the hardware. I have
> tr
Martin Michlmayr a écrit :
* Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-23 09:05]:
I was unable to build the kernel module on mipsel. The problem is that
1) The mipsisa32-be-elf version of hal.o is used on mipsel, which is
little endian
2) Depending on the CPU, the kernel could have multiple
* Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-23 09:05]:
> I was unable to build the kernel module on mipsel. The problem is that
> 1) The mipsisa32-be-elf version of hal.o is used on mipsel, which is
>little endian
> 2) Depending on the CPU, the kernel could have multiple formats, MIPS-I,
>
Package: madwidi-source
Version: 0.svn20060207-3
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
I was unable to build the kernel module on mipsel. The problem is that
1) The mipsisa32-be-elf version of hal.o is used on mipsel, which is
little endian
2) Depending on the CPU, the kernel could have multiple fo
13 matches
Mail list logo
