Hi maks,
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 04:18:14PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> rechecking the issues that were reported on #358397 and #362064
> 6) debconf note
> a preinst warning of the update.
See Manoj's reply for concerns about note vs. question here. I also don't
see any reason why the no
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to gmane.linux.debian.devel.kernel as well.
On Sun, 6 Aug 2006 02:16:59 +0200, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> * Manoj Srivastava [Sat, 05 Aug 2006 00:25:05 -0500]:
>> > 6) debconf note
>> > a preinst warning o
* Manoj Srivastava [Mon, 07 Aug 2006 13:40:09 -0500]:
> I am assuming you are not trolling, but merely do not know the
> behaviour of the image preinst script.
I know the behavior I observe in my systems. I have not read the code.
> The difference is that first, if kernel image
* Manoj Srivastava [Sat, 05 Aug 2006 00:25:05 -0500]:
> > 6) debconf note
> > a preinst warning of the update.
> Not a note. A question asked, and action taken based on the
> answer.
You mean like kernel-package's "Heya, I'm unpacking the a new version of
the same kernel, so you bette
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to gmane.linux.debian.devel.kernel as well.
On Fri, 4 Aug 2006 16:18:14 +0200, maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> hello Manoj and vorlon! rechecking the issues that were reported on
> #358397 and #362064
> 1
hello Manoj and vorlon!
rechecking the issues that were reported on #358397 and #362064
1) fails to install on read-only /boot
this is correct and not yet checked, boot is assumed rw.
we currently fail to check that, but non standard setup.
2) overwriting yaird generated image
only happened in s
6 matches
Mail list logo
