Coin,
"Bernhard R. Link" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If it cries with the same file again, that is a bug I have not yet seen.
> Unless it is told to include a file with the same name within the pool/
> directory but different size and md5sum it should happily use the one
> already there.
I ju
* Marc Dequènes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060323 02:38]:
> Fact is i need to import the old repository, and it is *quite* hard to
> have users change their habits.
Another try could be to includedsc the .dsc file first. That might also
catch the .orig.tar.gz, as has no listing of included files.
> But
Coin,
"Bernhard R. Link" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does dpkg-buildpackage -sa help you or do you still need that option?
Sorry, i lacked time for tests.
Fact is i need to import the old repository, and it is *quite* hard to
have users change their habits. But it would be nice to be able to
* Bernhard R. Link <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060320 00:51]:
> * Marc Dequènes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060319 17:19]:
> > When working on Debian packages you are not maintaining, but preparing
> > fixes for, you often have to upload a - (like
> > -5.hurdfr.1). This lead to include failure with reprepro beca
* Marc Dequènes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060319 17:19]:
> When working on Debian packages you are not maintaining, but preparing
> fixes for, you often have to upload a - (like
> -5.hurdfr.1). This lead to include failure with reprepro because the
> upstream tarball is not yet in the archive. It would
Package: reprepro
Version: 0.8.1-1
Severity: wishlist
Coin,
When working on Debian packages you are not maintaining, but preparing
fixes for, you often have to upload a - (like
-5.hurdfr.1). This lead to include failure with reprepro because the
upstream tarball is not yet in the archive. It wo
6 matches
Mail list logo
