On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 01:36:22PM +0100, Øystein Gisnås <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 01:17:28PM +0100, ?ystein Gisn?s <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How did you build this one ? How did you run yelp ? If you ran it within
> > gdb, can you try without gdb and see if
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 01:17:28PM +0100, ?ystein Gisn?s <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> How did you build this one ? How did you run yelp ? If you ran it within
> gdb, can you try without gdb and see if that crashes and if it does,
> what bug-buffy can give you ?
I built the package as I built
tir, 21,.03.2006 kl. 11.05 +0100, skrev Mike Hommey:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 10:15:49AM +0100, ?ystein Gisn?s <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > I also tried to downgrade to libxul0d_1.8.0.1-5, and try the
> > same. Result: no crash. After upgrading again, it crashes like before.
>
> Can you try
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 01:17:28PM +0100, ?ystein Gisn?s <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> It is getting a bit complicated with all the builds now. Let me try to
> sum up the results I've had so far. I've been running the same install
> of yelp 2.14 all the time (no de-install/install). I did the daily
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 10:15:49AM +0100, ?ystein Gisn?s <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I also tried to downgrade to libxul0d_1.8.0.1-5, and try the
> same. Result: no crash. After upgrading again, it crashes like before.
Can you try the following package ?
http://people.debian.org/~glandium/libxul
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 10:15:49AM +0100, ?ystein Gisn?s <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 09:10:55AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 06:42:35AM +0100, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > Since you bothered to build a xulrunner with -g, could
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 09:10:55AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 06:42:35AM +0100, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Since you bothered to build a xulrunner with -g, could you give a full
> > backtrace ? (bt full)
>
> Something else that could be interesting would
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 06:42:35AM +0100, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since you bothered to build a xulrunner with -g, could you give a full
> backtrace ? (bt full)
Something else that could be interesting would be to see if a rebuilt
xulrunner 1.8.0.1-5 with an uptodate unstable chro
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 02:38:22AM +0100, Øystein Gisnås <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > gdb (w/o debug symbols):
> > (gdb) run
> > Starting program: /usr/bin/yelp
> > [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
> > [New Thread -1239247168 (LWP 13592)]
> > [New Thread -1241773136 (LWP 13602)]
> >
> gdb (w/o debug symbols):
> (gdb) run
> Starting program: /usr/bin/yelp
> [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
> [New Thread -1239247168 (LWP 13592)]
> [New Thread -1241773136 (LWP 13602)]
> [New Thread -1250894928 (LWP 13603)]
> [New Thread -1259799632 (LWP 13607)]
>
> Program received
10 matches
Mail list logo
