Bug#356356: nullmailer: doesn't permit mail from <>

2006-06-25 Thread Nick Leverton
Hi Norbert, apologies for the long silence. Work took over my life, and for some reason I didn't get your BTS prod of 15th May. The attached single patch replaces both my previous patches, and implements null envelope-sender both for nullmailer-queue and for nullmailer-inject. Nullmailer-queue

Bug#356356: nullmailer: doesn't permit mail from <>

2006-05-15 Thread Norbert Tretkowski
Hi Nick, > But - sorry Norbert, I just realised I haven't tested the cases > where the Return-Path is <>, so please hold off on these until I get > the chance. any news here? Thanks, Norbert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble

Bug#356356: nullmailer: doesn't permit mail from <>

2006-03-11 Thread Nick Leverton
This patch does the same for nullmailer-inject. To the best of my knowledge, Return-Path is always the most recent sender. So if we're taking the envelope from the existing headers then Return-Path should be still used, even where there is a Resent-From. But - sorry Norbert, I just realised I ha

Bug#356356: nullmailer: doesn't permit mail from <>

2006-03-11 Thread Nick Leverton
Package: nullmailer Version: 1:1.02-1njl.0 Severity: normal When using nullmailer as part of a filter chain, null envelope sender (MAIL FROM:<>) is quite valid. Nullmailer-queue rejects this address. A patch is attached to allow it. I'll do the same fix for nullmailer-inject soon (hopefully thi