Hello,
peter green, le Mon 27 Oct 2008 23:37:17 +, a écrit :
> This bug has been pending for over a fortnight and the bug that was
> marked as blocking it after it was tagged pending was fixed over a week ago.
>
> What is the current status of the bug and if there are still problems is
> th
This bug has been pending for over a fortnight and the bug that was
marked as blocking it after it was tagged pending was fixed over a week ago.
What is the current status of the bug and if there are still problems is
the work in progress code availible anywhere?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
Hello,
Resending without the patch as it seems some mail servers don't like
160KB patches.
Samuel Thibault, le Tue 07 Oct 2008 11:06:23 +0200, a écrit :
> Peter commited upstream my yasm patch to support tasm syntax for
> loadlin, here is a backport to the debian package (just a few minor
> chang
Thomas Viehmann, le Tue 30 Sep 2008 21:46:24 +0200, a écrit :
> so another month has passed.
Sorry for having taken some time to switch country :)
> Unless we do plan to fix this shortly, it might be better to actually
> drop loadlin from Debian unstable and fix any reverse
> (build-)dependencies
Hi,
so another month has passed.
Unless we do plan to fix this shortly, it might be better to actually
drop loadlin from Debian unstable and fix any reverse
(build-)dependencies now rather than postponing stuff further and further.
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
Robert Millan, le Fri 29 Aug 2008 18:46:23 +0200, a écrit :
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 01:43:14AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > One sad piece of news is that I wasn't able to contact upstream again:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't work any more. However, if people confirm
> > that he has been los
Robert Millan, le Fri 29 Aug 2008 19:14:28 +0200, a écrit :
> I don't know how intrusive is your patch, but if upstream is not responsive,
Oops, sorry, I meant loadlin upstream.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTE
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 06:00:39PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Robert Millan, le Fri 29 Aug 2008 18:46:23 +0200, a écrit :
> > On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 01:43:14AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > One sad piece of news is that I wasn't able to contact upstream again:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] do
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 01:43:14AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Just to give an update on the status: I'm currently able to compile a
> working loadlin.exe from source thanks to a patch against yasm 0.5. I
> need to port that to 0.7 and submit upstream (actually it should be
> easie
Hello,
Just to give an update on the status: I'm currently able to compile a
working loadlin.exe from source thanks to a patch against yasm 0.5. I
need to port that to 0.7 and submit upstream (actually it should be
easier for upstream to accept it in 0.7 than in 0.5 since the parser got
rewritten
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 04:11:51PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Robert Millan, le Mon 05 May 2008 17:04:08 +0200, a écrit :
> > On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 11:18:46PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > > Hmm, now that there is win32-loader, is this still needed for blind
> > > people or not ?
> >
Robert Millan, le Mon 05 May 2008 17:04:08 +0200, a écrit :
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 11:18:46PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Hmm, now that there is win32-loader, is this still needed for blind
> > people or not ?
>
> Still needed. Specially more because of win32-loader, since win32-loader
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 11:18:46PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>
> Hmm, now that there is win32-loader, is this still needed for blind
> people or not ?
Still needed. Specially more because of win32-loader, since win32-loader
currently relies on loadlin.exe when running on win9x.
(think of
Pierre Habouzit, le Fri 31 Aug 2007 10:05:40 +0200, a écrit :
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 07:57:02AM +, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Pierre Habouzit, le Thu 30 Aug 2007 23:18:46 +0200, a écrit :
> > > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 10:01:56PM +, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 07:57:02AM +, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Pierre Habouzit, le Thu 30 Aug 2007 23:18:46 +0200, a écrit :
> > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 10:01:56PM +, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Sven Joachim, le Thu 09 Mar 2006 13:45:04 +0100, a écrit :
> > > > (b
Hi,
Pierre Habouzit, le Thu 30 Aug 2007 23:18:46 +0200, a écrit :
> On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 10:01:56PM +, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sven Joachim, le Thu 09 Mar 2006 13:45:04 +0100, a écrit :
> > > (b) Failing that, move the loadlin package to the contrib section, see
> > > se
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 10:01:56PM +, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sven Joachim, le Thu 09 Mar 2006 13:45:04 +0100, a écrit :
> > (b) Failing that, move the loadlin package to the contrib section, see
> > sections 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 of the Policy Manual.
>
> This would be _very_ unfortun
block 356055 by 396291
thanks
Hi,
Samuel Thibault, le Sun 29 Oct 2006 21:02:52 +0100, a écrit :
> http://dept-info.labri.fr/~thibault/tmp/patch-loadlin
>
> this builds, runs, and boots fine!!
I cleaned the patch a bit, it now also compiles with legacy TASM.EXE,
so the patch should be fine to ap
Hi,
Samuel Thibault, le Sun 08 Oct 2006 23:41:00 +0200, a écrit :
> Samuel Thibault, le Tue 19 Sep 2006 15:03:47 +0200, a écrit :
> > I put a (really) rough patch on
> > http://dept-info.labri.fr/~thibault/tmp/patch-yasm
I updated the patch again, plus a loadlin patch in
http://dept-info.labri.f
Hi,
Samuel Thibault, le Tue 19 Sep 2006 15:03:47 +0200, a écrit :
> I put a (really) rough patch on
> http://dept-info.labri.fr/~thibault/tmp/patch-yasm
I updated this patch. It should apply fine to debian's current yasm.
With it I was able to recompile my good old .COM programs, quite neat :)
T
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 02:29:40PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Christian Aichinger, le Tue 19 Sep 2006 13:14:25 +0200, a écrit :
> > > Yasm is just a generic assembler that supports both nasm and gas syntax,
> > > and is almost ready for tasm.
>
> > How far are you?
>
> Syntax is almost done:
Christian Aichinger, le Tue 19 Sep 2006 14:49:32 +0200, a écrit :
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 02:29:40PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Christian Aichinger, le Tue 19 Sep 2006 13:14:25 +0200, a écrit :
> > > > Yasm is just a generic assembler that supports both nasm and gas syntax,
> > > > and is
Christian Aichinger, le Tue 19 Sep 2006 13:14:25 +0200, a écrit :
> > Yasm is just a generic assembler that supports both nasm and gas syntax,
> > and is almost ready for tasm.
>
> I see you asked on yasm-devel about that already:
> http://cvs.tortall.net/pipermail/yasm-devel/2006-May/000152.html
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 11:20:11PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > I don't remember exactly anymore, but when I looked at it yasm
> > didn't look very promising for porting loadlin to it.
Well, I remember now:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/loadlin/yasm$ yasm -p help
Available yasm parsers:
gas
Christian Aichinger, le Fri 08 Sep 2006 22:44:51 +0200, a écrit :
> On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 07:59:57AM +0200, LENART Janos wrote:
> > > The problem is that in some circumstances, blind people _DO_
> > > need loadlin for being able to install/boot linux. That's one of
> > > the reason why it is stil
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 07:59:57AM +0200, LENART Janos wrote:
> > The problem is that in some circumstances, blind people _DO_
> > need loadlin for being able to install/boot linux. That's one of
> > the reason why it is still provided on installation CDs (btw,
> > Janos, could you at last apply th
On 5/3/06, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sven Joachim, le Thu 09 Mar 2006 13:45:04 +0100, a écrit :
> (b) Failing that, move the loadlin package to the contrib section, see
> sections 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 of the Policy Manual.
This would be _very_ unfortunate.
Very much indeed.
wh
Hi,
Sven Joachim, le Thu 09 Mar 2006 13:45:04 +0100, a écrit :
> (b) Failing that, move the loadlin package to the contrib section, see
> sections 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 of the Policy Manual.
This would be _very_ unfortunate.
The problem is that in some circumstances, blind people _DO_ need
loadlin
Package: loadlin
Version: 1.6c.really1.6c-1
Severity: serious
The DOS executable loadlin.exe is not rebuilt in the maintainer
scripts, and it appears it even cannot be built with programs in
Debian since the makefile in the src directory starts as follows:
# Makefile for LOADLIN-1.6 (C) 1994..19
29 matches
Mail list logo
