> --- Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > BTW; Matej suggests that vcg is likely going to be removed from the
> > archive unless someone adopts it. I think its interesting software,
> > but I don't consider myself a user, or a prospective maintainer.
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 01:39:03PM -0
Hi,
I intend on picking up on maintainence of VCG, but I dont have the time
atm. I have rewritten portions of the uglified code and plan on doing
more.
mike
--- Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW; Matej suggests that vcg is likely going to be removed from the
> archive unless someone a
On Sun, 5 Mar 2006 15:26:03 -0500
Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On i386, there are manpages for both vcg and xvcg, both included in
> full, but there is no /usr/bin/vcg. Is it missing, or is the manpage
> "extra"? If both manpages remain, one should probably be a symlink,
> or use t
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 09:51:58PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Mar 2006 15:26:03 -0500 Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On i386, there are manpages for both vcg and xvcg, both included in
> > full, but there is no /usr/bin/vcg. Is it missing, or is the manpage
> > "e
Package: vcg
Version: 1.30debian-3
Severity: normal
On i386, there are manpages for both vcg and xvcg, both included in
full, but there is no /usr/bin/vcg. Is it missing, or is the manpage
"extra"? If both manpages remain, one should probably be a symlink,
or use the manpage "include" directive.
5 matches
Mail list logo
