Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 02:53:39PM -0600, Harley D. Eades III wrote:
Sven Luther wrote:
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 04:37:10PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Philip Armstrong wrote:
If there was a way to get partman to not use parted to detect the
partit
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 02:53:39PM -0600, Harley D. Eades III wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
>
> >On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 04:37:10PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Philip Armstrong wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>If there was a way to get partman to not use parted to detect the
> >>>partitions, but to
Sven Luther wrote:
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 04:37:10PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Philip Armstrong wrote:
If there was a way to get partman to not use parted to detect the
partitions, but to just use the existing kernel detected ones in
/proc/partitions (which of course would not be editab
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 04:37:10PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Philip Armstrong wrote:
> > If there was a way to get partman to not use parted to detect the
> > partitions, but to just use the existing kernel detected ones in
> > /proc/partitions (which of course would not be editable) then that
> >
Philip Armstrong wrote:
> If there was a way to get partman to not use parted to detect the
> partitions, but to just use the existing kernel detected ones in
> /proc/partitions (which of course would not be editable) then that
> would at least allow pre-existing partitions to be used by the
> inst
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 06:30:19PM +, Philip Armstrong wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 07:04:31PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/308424/
> >
> > What I read from it, is that it has a "another disklabel"
> > I now can imagine why partmen fails, but _I_ have
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 07:04:31PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/308424/
>
> What I read from it, is that it has a "another disklabel"
> I now can imagine why partmen fails, but _I_ have no clue how to fix it.
Indeed. Why MS couldn't just use Intel's GPT disklab
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/308424/
What I read from it, is that it has a "another disklabel"
I now can imagine why partmen fails, but _I_ have no clue how to fix it.
Sorry,
Geert Stappers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 06:17:31PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > > What do you mean by "dynamic partitions"?
> >
> > They're in the new (not so very new now) windows partition format.
>
> Please provide links to documentation of it.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/308424/
http://prdownloads.s
> > What do you mean by "dynamic partitions"?
>
> They're in the new (not so very new now) windows partition format.
Please provide links to documentation of it.
Thanks
Geert Stappers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTE
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 05:00:00PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 02 March 2006 16:14, Philip Armstrong wrote:
> > Comments/Problems:
> > Partman can't see the windows dynamic disk partitions, even though the
> > kernel can.
>
> What do you mean by "dynamic partitions"? Do you mean you have
On Thursday 02 March 2006 16:14, Philip Armstrong wrote:
> Comments/Problems:
> Partman can't see the windows dynamic disk partitions, even though the
> kernel can.
What do you mean by "dynamic partitions"? Do you mean you have them set up
as RAID in the BIOS (dmraid)? In that case that is indeed
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.12
Severity: normal
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: network
Image version: AMD64 daily on 02Mar2006 from
http://amd64.debian.net/debian-installer/daily/netboot/netboot.tar.gz
Date:
Machine: Biostar IDEQ 330P, Dual Core Athlon 64
Partitions:
13 matches
Mail list logo
