Bug#354723: Problem absent in Version 1.1.3

2006-03-02 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 03:47:03PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: Content-Description: message body text > On 2 March 2006 at 13:18, Steve Langasek wrote: > | On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 10:58:23AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > | > Upstream's changelog doesn't reveal anything either: > | On the

Bug#354723: Problem absent in Version 1.1.3

2006-03-02 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 10:58:23AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > Upstream's changelog doesn't reveal anything either: On the contrary, the first entry is suspicious: > Version: 1.1-5 (2006-01-10, released) > * Added a cast in RODBC.c to counteract a warning Dirk Eddelbuettel >

Bug#354723: Problem absent in Version 1.1.3

2006-03-02 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 2 March 2006 at 17:21, Johannes Ranke wrote: | The bug is absent in r-cran-rodbc 1.1.3 from the current stable | distribution. Interesting. Here is RODBC's changelog. I still feel that RODBC is an innocent bystander here: rodbc (1.1.5-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release * deb

Bug#354723: Problem absent in Version 1.1.3

2006-03-02 Thread Johannes Ranke
The bug is absent in r-cran-rodbc 1.1.3 from the current stable distribution. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]