Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I consider update-* WITH the option --check NOT suitable to be put into
> a postinst script.
>
> I would consider it only as a QA check when testing packages, or when a
> sysadmin wants to check his local changes, or whatever.
>
> So this - for me - is
On Mit, 01 Mär 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
> On the other hand, for a Debian utility like update-language (I know,
> update-fontlang) it makes sense to make just a simple check - this would
> catch errors that are more specific to Debian and its modularized setup:
> Buggy packages; people who mix up
Any reason why this wasn't sent to the bug? I hope it's just a mistake.
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pro inclusion:
> - it may be useful for some
> - language check were not done up to now
> - doesn't clutter the file since the functions are not too long
>
> Contra inclusion:
>
3 matches
Mail list logo
