Hi,
as gecko-sharp is dead and unmaintained, and no other package depends on
it anymore, why not request its removal from the archive?
Cheers,
Michael
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: Open
On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 03:13 +0200, Krzysztof Sobiecki wrote:
> I have made small patch(low quality) to compile libgecko-cil with
> xulrunner. (license same as package)
Thanks for the patch, but gecko-sharp is dead, it's not going in testing
anymore. gecko-sharp2 is used instead, which uses xulrunn
I have made small patch(low quality) to compile libgecko-cil with
xulrunner. (license same as package)
diff -urp ./gecko-sharp-0.6/debian/control ./gecko-sharp-0.6~/debian/control
--- ./gecko-sharp-0.6/debian/control2006-09-22 19:44:14.0 +0200
+++ ./gecko-sharp-0.6~/debian/control 20
Package: libgecko-cil
Version: 0.6-3
Severity: wishlist
No that xulrunner is in unstable it would be nice if libgecko-cil
could use gtkmozembed from libxul. You would have to change the
build-dep from mozilla-dev to libxul-dev and the runtime-dep from
mozilla-browers to libxul0d.
In addition gtkmo
4 matches
Mail list logo
