Frank Küster wrote:
> Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Frank Küster wrote:
>> [...]
>>> At least libcairo is wrong; I think that also libfontconfig, libjpeg,
>>> libfreetype, and maybe libX11 and libXrender are wrong, because
>>
>> I wouldn't be surprised if libjpeg is actually needed
Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank Küster wrote:
> [...]
>> At least libcairo is wrong; I think that also libfontconfig, libjpeg,
>> libfreetype, and maybe libX11 and libXrender are wrong, because
>
> I wouldn't be surprised if libjpeg is actually needed, since pdftex is
> able to in
Frank Küster wrote:
[...]
> At least libcairo is wrong; I think that also libfontconfig, libjpeg,
> libfreetype, and maybe libX11 and libXrender are wrong, because
I wouldn't be surprised if libjpeg is actually needed, since pdftex is
able to include JPEG files directly into the PDF. But there sh
On Don, 16 Mär 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
> $ objdump -p /sid/usr/bin/pdfetex | grep NEEDED
> NEEDED libpng12.so.0
> NEEDED libkpathsea.so.4
> NEEDED libpoppler.so.0
> NEEDED libcairo.so.2
> NEEDED libXrender.so.1
> NEEDED libX11.so.6
> NEEDED libfont
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> No, objdump shows less libraries, but still too much.
>
> Which ones should not be there?
$ objdump -p /sid/usr/bin/pdfetex | grep NEEDED
NEEDED libpng12.so.0
NEEDED libkpathsea.so.4
NEEDED libpoppler.so.0
NEEDED libcairo.s
* Frank Küster wrote on Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 10:07:07AM CET:
> Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > should get you going.
>
> Sorry, could you please describe exactly what we are supposed to do in
> *which* file?
Oh, sorry, too late last night. I'll post a patch.
> > The library de
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> should get you going.
Sorry, could you please describe exactly what we are supposed to do in
*which* file?
> The library dependency issue was solved before, right (using "objdump -p"
> rather than ldd to find direct dependencies showed not-too-much)?
* Frank Küster wrote on Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 11:51:57AM CET:
> Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > But even after fixing this, tetex-bin seems to be using some obscure and
> >> > obsolete feature of autoconf 2.13 that replaces "ac_include
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [ Please Cc: me on replies ]
>
> Hi Frank,
>
>> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > But even after fixing this, tetex-bin seems to be using some obscure and
>> > obsolete feature of autoconf 2.13 that replaces "ac_include $file" in
>> > Makef
[ Please Cc: me on replies ]
Hi Frank,
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But even after fixing this, tetex-bin seems to be using some obscure and
> > obsolete feature of autoconf 2.13 that replaces "ac_include $file" in
> > Makefile.in with the contents of that file in the output Ma
10 matches
Mail list logo
