On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 10:21:49PM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 07:13:01AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 02:51:46PM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 10:28:01PM +0100, Josselin M
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 07:13:01AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 02:51:46PM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 10:28:01PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > Package: libxul-dev
> > > Version: 1.8.0.1-2
> > > Severity: serious
> >
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 02:51:46PM -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 10:28:01PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Package: libxul-dev
> > Version: 1.8.0.1-2
> > Severity: serious
>
> > The file /usr/lib/libxpcom.so can also be found in mozilla-browser.
>
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 10:28:01PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Package: libxul-dev
> Version: 1.8.0.1-2
> Severity: serious
> The file /usr/lib/libxpcom.so can also be found in mozilla-browser.
> Though there are dependencies on packages that already conflict with it,
> there should also be
Package: libxul-dev
Version: 1.8.0.1-2
Severity: serious
The file /usr/lib/libxpcom.so can also be found in mozilla-browser.
Though there are dependencies on packages that already conflict with it,
there should also be an explicit conflict in libxul-dev.
Regards,
--
.''`. Josselin M
5 matches
Mail list logo