Bug#352849: downgrading bug from grave to important

2006-02-18 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
severity 352849 serious thanks Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> If you think I should leave the bug RC pending a reliable way to >> reproduce the problem in sid, please upgrade. Note also that the >> current sid version contains a security fix that is not in etch, but >> as far as

Bug#352849: downgrading bug from grave to important

2006-02-18 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 08:12:14PM -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 07:17:43PM -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > >> This bug, reporting that tiff2pdf segfaults on a particular image, was > >> listed as grave but is not grave. It do

Bug#352849: downgrading bug from grave to important

2006-02-18 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 07:17:43PM -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > >> This bug, reporting that tiff2pdf segfaults on a particular image, was >> listed as grave but is not grave. It does not render the software >> unusable to a majority of users, and it h

Bug#352849: downgrading bug from grave to important

2006-02-18 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 07:17:43PM -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > This bug, reporting that tiff2pdf segfaults on a particular image, was > listed as grave but is not grave. It does not render the software > unusable to a majority of users, and it has an easy workaround (use > some other program,

Bug#352849: downgrading bug from grave to important

2006-02-18 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
severity 352849 normal thanks This bug, reporting that tiff2pdf segfaults on a particular image, was listed as grave but is not grave. It does not render the software unusable to a majority of users, and it has an easy workaround (use some other program, like convert from imagemagick, to convert