severity 352849 serious
thanks
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If you think I should leave the bug RC pending a reliable way to
>> reproduce the problem in sid, please upgrade. Note also that the
>> current sid version contains a security fix that is not in etch, but
>> as far as
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 08:12:14PM -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 07:17:43PM -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> >> This bug, reporting that tiff2pdf segfaults on a particular image, was
> >> listed as grave but is not grave. It do
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 07:17:43PM -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
>
>> This bug, reporting that tiff2pdf segfaults on a particular image, was
>> listed as grave but is not grave. It does not render the software
>> unusable to a majority of users, and it h
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 07:17:43PM -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> This bug, reporting that tiff2pdf segfaults on a particular image, was
> listed as grave but is not grave. It does not render the software
> unusable to a majority of users, and it has an easy workaround (use
> some other program,
severity 352849 normal
thanks
This bug, reporting that tiff2pdf segfaults on a particular image, was
listed as grave but is not grave. It does not render the software
unusable to a majority of users, and it has an easy workaround (use
some other program, like convert from imagemagick, to convert
5 matches
Mail list logo