> * Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-10 17:06]:
> Not all, just the current one. But, erm, I wonder how it find outs
> whether to kill the ripper or encoder, so maybe I'm wrong... and I
> cannot check right now. I think it kills the current ripper if
> there's one, otherwise the
* Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-10 17:06]:
> > It should work for encoders too. Doesn't it?
>
> No idea... Haven't actually tried. If C-c kills all running encoders and
> rippers, that seems even more useless...
Not all, just the current one. But, erm, I wonder how it find ou
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 06:30:59PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-10 09:41]:
> > I can think of several reasons you'd want to quickly kill jack
> > completely:
>
> Well, but you have 'Q' which will quit immediately.
Sure. That's a small argument
* Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-10 09:41]:
> I can think of several reasons you'd want to quickly kill jack
> completely:
Well, but you have 'Q' which will quit immediately.
> I can not think of any reason why I'd want to kill the rip of the
> current track and immediately proce
On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 07:24:56AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-30 15:38]:
> > Nah, I expect C-c to "kill this action". Usually, that means "quit and
> > return to the shell." With Jack, I expected "this action" to be "rip
> > the cd", so
5 matches
Mail list logo
