Bug#351496: samba: connect to share

2006-02-07 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 10:52:48AM +0300, Vladimir Stavrinov wrote: > On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 06:40:10AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > > > Are you using security=server? > Yes. Then your bug is bug #346045, which is fixed in 3.0.21b-1. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever lo

Bug#351496: samba: connect to share

2006-02-07 Thread Vladimir Stavrinov
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 06:40:10AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > > Are you using security=server? Yes. > Also please check whether crashes are still happening with the > version 3.0.21b-1 which is currently available from > incoming.debian.org and will move to the archive in about 12 > hours

Bug#351496: samba: connect to share

2006-02-06 Thread Christian Perrier
tags 351496 moreinfo thanks Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 04:12:49PM +0300, Vladimir Stavrinov wrote: > > Package: samba > > Version: 3.0.21a-4 > > Followup-For: Bug #351496 > > > The same problem: samba segfault when client try connect to share from > > Wi

Bug#351496: samba: connect to share

2006-02-06 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 04:12:49PM +0300, Vladimir Stavrinov wrote: > Package: samba > Version: 3.0.21a-4 > Followup-For: Bug #351496 > The same problem: samba segfault when client try connect to share from > Windows box. Are you using security=server? > What happen with samba? Some years ago it

Bug#351496: samba: connect to share

2006-02-06 Thread Vladimir Stavrinov
Package: samba Version: 3.0.21a-4 Followup-For: Bug #351496 The same problem: samba segfault when client try connect to share from Windows box. What happen with samba? Some years ago it was reliable, and now it quit buggy. We see many bug reports with key word "segfault" that seems was fixed but