On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 02:46:33PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
> On Fri 03 Feb 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 01:03:07PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
> > > I did an upgrade yesterday, and since then I'm being bombarded with
> > > "Segfault in Samba" email messages.
> > Did
On Fri 03 Feb 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 01:03:07PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
>
> > I did an upgrade yesterday, and since then I'm being bombarded with
> > "Segfault in Samba" email messages.
>
> Did those emails not include a usable backtrace? (Possibly not, since I
Hi Paul,
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 01:03:07PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
> I did an upgrade yesterday, and since then I'm being bombarded with
> "Segfault in Samba" email messages.
Did those emails not include a usable backtrace? (Possibly not, since I'm
told gdb doesn't handle -fPIE very well,
Package: samba
Version: 3.0.21a-1
Severity: normal
I did an upgrade yesterday, and since then I'm being bombarded with
"Segfault in Samba" email messages.
>From smbd.log:
[2006/02/03 12:25:51, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(666)
jop (192.168.170.196) connect to service data initially a
4 matches
Mail list logo
