Bug#351232: better handling of word boundaries

2006-02-10 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.02.10.1643 +0100]: > > What if I cannot produce the .dvi files because my publisher has all > > the periphery? > > (Hmm, why in earth would you want to create a non-free document? :-) It's not non-free for me. I just can't be bothered. > Anyway

Bug#351232: better handling of word boundaries

2006-02-10 Thread Santiago Vila
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.02.03.1351 +0100]: > > It is a little bit late to change the behaviour of this program. > > Instead, why don't you wdiff the result of running dvi2tty on the .dvi > > files? > > What if I cannot prod

Bug#351232: better handling of word boundaries

2006-02-03 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.02.03.1351 +0100]: > It is a little bit late to change the behaviour of this program. > Instead, why don't you wdiff the result of running dvi2tty on the .dvi files? What if I cannot produce the .dvi files because my publisher has all the periphe

Bug#351232: better handling of word boundaries

2006-02-03 Thread Santiago Vila
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, martin f krafft wrote: > Package: wdiff > Version: 0.5-16 > Severity: wishlist > > If using wdiff on TeX files, it's really annoying if a change > involves attached TeX tags. E.g.: > > This > link\footnote{\link{http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/{\tilde}sgtatham/bugs.html}

Bug#351232: better handling of word boundaries

2006-02-03 Thread martin f krafft
Package: wdiff Version: 0.5-16 Severity: wishlist If using wdiff on TeX files, it's really annoying if a change involves attached TeX tags. E.g.: This link\footnote{\link{http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/{\tilde}sgtatham/bugs.html}} If I wanted to capitalise link, wdiff would say that li