Bug#348766: samba: logrotate fails when killing log.nmbd

2006-01-21 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 07:50:18AM -0800, Bill Wohler wrote: > Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > ..or add "127.0.0.1" to "interfaces" (I > > > > suppose you're using "bind interfaces only = yes"). > > > I don't quite follow. I currently have the fo

Bug#348766: samba: logrotate fails when killing log.nmbd

2006-01-21 Thread Bill Wohler
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > ..or add "127.0.0.1" to "interfaces" (I > > > suppose you're using "bind interfaces only = yes"). > > > > I don't quite follow. I currently have the following in > > /etc/network/interfaces: > > > > iface lo

Bug#348766: samba: logrotate fails when killing log.nmbd

2006-01-20 Thread Christian Perrier
> Maybe there is some race condition where the lo interface is temporarily > unavailable during suspend/resume and nmbd might be looking at just that > time. > > Doesn't smbd have the same algorithm? It isn't going down. Because it does work on the lo interface for instance ;..while nmbd is irrel

Bug#348766: samba: logrotate fails when killing log.nmbd

2006-01-20 Thread Bill Wohler
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Given the time of the reload, I had probably suspended and resumed my > > laptop. I bring down all the network interfaces on suspend in > > anticipation of coming up on a new interface elsewhere. > > including the "lo" interface? Sorry for the amb

Bug#348766: samba: logrotate fails when killing log.nmbd

2006-01-19 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 07:12:56AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > > Given the time of the reload, I had probably suspended and resumed my > > laptop. I bring down all the network interfaces on suspend in > > anticipation of coming up on a new interface elsewhere. > including the "lo" interface?

Bug#348766: samba: logrotate fails when killing log.nmbd

2006-01-19 Thread Christian Perrier
> Good question. Looking... > > In /var/log/samba: > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 486 2006-01-13 09:11 log.nmbd.1 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 2006-01-15 03:06 log.nmbd > > Here is the entire content of log.nmbd.1 (it's short, and filled for > readability): > > [2006/01/12 13:29:12, 0] nmbd

Bug#348766: samba: logrotate fails when killing log.nmbd

2006-01-19 Thread Bill Wohler
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Perhaps this bug report should be about why nmbd went away on my system > > without removing /var/run/samba/nmbd.pid (note that I am not actively > > using samba at the moment). > > Do you have any sign of a nmbd crash in your logs? Good question.

Bug#348766: samba: logrotate fails when killing log.nmbd

2006-01-18 Thread Christian Perrier
> Perhaps this bug report should be about why nmbd went away on my system > without removing /var/run/samba/nmbd.pid (note that I am not actively > using samba at the moment). Do you have any sign of a nmbd crash in your logs? So far, this is the only case I've seen stale PID files: bad crash of

Bug#348766: samba: logrotate fails when killing log.nmbd

2006-01-18 Thread Bill Wohler
Package: samba Version: 3.0.20b-3 Severity: normal fcron reports the following: /etc/cron.daily/logrotate: sh: line 1: kill: (7056) - No such process error: error running postrotate script for /var/log/samba/log.nmbd run-parts: /etc/cron.daily/logrotate exited with return code 1 Looking