On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 11:39:28AM +, Ronny Adsetts wrote:
> In that case, unless you receive contrary info, I'd suggest marking as
> fixed in the Etch version of exim.
I'll wait for your findings for a few days and will then close for
4.63-17. Thanks for trying again.
Greetings
Marc
--
--
Marc Haber said at 23/02/2008 11:12:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 11:10:27AM +, Ronny Adsetts wrote:
Marc Haber said at 23/02/2008 10:18:
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 10:32:26AM +0100, Ronny Adsetts wrote:
This error is occurring with 4.50-8sarge2 on Sarge too. Judging by my
munin graphs on both sen
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 11:10:27AM +, Ronny Adsetts wrote:
> Marc Haber said at 23/02/2008 10:18:
> >On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 10:32:26AM +0100, Ronny Adsetts wrote:
> >>This error is occurring with 4.50-8sarge2 on Sarge too. Judging by my
> >>munin graphs on both sending and receiving side, ther
Marc Haber said at 23/02/2008 10:18:
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 10:32:26AM +0100, Ronny Adsetts wrote:
This error is occurring with 4.50-8sarge2 on Sarge too. Judging by my
munin graphs on both sending and receiving side, there's no entropy on
the sending side. I noticed this error yesterday when t
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 10:32:26AM +0100, Ronny Adsetts wrote:
> This error is occurring with 4.50-8sarge2 on Sarge too. Judging by my
> munin graphs on both sending and receiving side, there's no entropy on
> the sending side. I noticed this error yesterday when there was
> testing on a client's s
Hi.
This error is occurring with 4.50-8sarge2 on Sarge too. Judging by my munin
graphs on both sending and receiving side, there's no entropy on the sending
side. I noticed this error yesterday when there was testing on a client's site
that resulted in a couple of hundred emails being sent to u
6 matches
Mail list logo
