On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 17:33:25 -0500 Joey Hess wrote:
> I didn't realize that Joss's changes to dh_python were leading policy in
> this way. If the only alternative to having this RC bug remain open is
> reverting those changes until the python people have agreed how things
> should work, then I woul
Matthias Klose wrote:
> I think so, I wouldn't have submitted it else. python-support is not
> yet finished, you agreed to changes, which aren't documented besides
> on #irc. IMO it's better to propose these changes first and agree on
> them. Other comments have been posted on debian-python as we
Josselin Mouette writes:
> Le jeudi 12 janvier 2006 à 14:58 +0100, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> > Package: python,debhelper
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > dh_python currently doesn't honor current python policy (but says so
> > in the manual page). the version should not yet enter testing until
> >
Le jeudi 12 janvier 2006 à 14:58 +0100, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> Package: python,debhelper
> Severity: serious
>
> dh_python currently doesn't honor current python policy (but says so
> in the manual page). the version should not yet enter testing until
> one of the two is updated.
I don't thi
Package: python,debhelper
Severity: serious
dh_python currently doesn't honor current python policy (but says so
in the manual page). the version should not yet enter testing until
one of the two is updated.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
5 matches
Mail list logo