Bug#347697: odd gcc bug reappears in 4.0.3

2006-07-08 Thread Matthias Klose
tags 347697 + moreinfo thanks please recheck with gcc-4.1 (from unstable) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#347697: odd gcc bug reappears in 4.0.3

2006-03-05 Thread Chris Howie
Falk Hueffner wrote: > I just briefly tried to debug it, but apparently, it even wants a > Yahoo password or something. This is more effort than I want to spend > on something that I suspect isn't even a gcc bug (and frankly, I > wouldn't expect anybody else to jump in). Have you read the message

Bug#347697: odd gcc bug reappears in 4.0.3

2006-03-04 Thread Falk Hueffner
Chris Howie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Falk Hueffner wrote: >> the fact that your program crashes in glibc memory manangement makes >> it quite unlikely that this is a compiler bug. Can you try valgrind? >> Also, your test case is quite large, would it be possible to get >> something smaller? >

Bug#347697: odd gcc bug reappears in 4.0.3

2006-03-04 Thread Chris Howie
Falk Hueffner wrote: > the fact that your program crashes in glibc memory manangement makes > it quite unlikely that this is a compiler bug. Can you try valgrind? I can see why you would think that now. Let me explain why the free() call is segfaulting: #0 0xb7e6bab9 in free () from /lib/tls/li

Bug#347697: odd gcc bug reappears in 4.0.3

2006-03-04 Thread Chris Howie
Falk Hueffner wrote: > the fact that your program crashes in glibc memory manangement makes > it quite unlikely that this is a compiler bug. Can you try valgrind? > Also, your test case is quite large, would it be possible to get > something smaller? Then why does it work find with -finline-functi

Bug#347697: odd gcc bug reappears in 4.0.3

2006-03-04 Thread Falk Hueffner
tags 347697 + moreinfo thanks Hi, the fact that your program crashes in glibc memory manangement makes it quite unlikely that this is a compiler bug. Can you try valgrind? Also, your test case is quite large, would it be possible to get something smaller? -- Falk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, e