Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 25.03.2010, 22:13 +0100 schrieb maximilian attems:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:12:24PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> >
> > Note that the next upload will go through NEW. If you don???t want a delay
> > when you actually want to refer to a new version, you should conside
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:12:24PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
>
> Note that the next upload will go through NEW. If you don???t want a delay
> when you actually want to refer to a new version, you should consider
> uploading version 26 before the next kernel version bump.
>
we are used to go
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 16.03.2010, 19:53 +0100 schrieb maximilian attems:
> > I gave it a shot. Patch against latest svn is attached, here is the
> > resulting change to the generated control file:
>
> thanks applied.
great, thanks.
Note that the next upload will go through NEW. If you don’t want
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi Maximilain,
>
> Am Dienstag, den 16.03.2010, 15:47 +0100 schrieb maximilian attems:
> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 02:41:16PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > > I???d like to amend this wishlist bug report. I???d find it very useful to
> > > have a
Hi Maximilain,
Am Dienstag, den 16.03.2010, 15:47 +0100 schrieb maximilian attems:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 02:41:16PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > I???d like to amend this wishlist bug report. I???d find it very useful to
> > have a linux-doc-2.6 meta package automatically pulling in the l
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 02:41:16PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I???d like to amend this wishlist bug report. I???d find it very useful to
> have a linux-doc-2.6 meta package automatically pulling in the latest
> -doc package, corresponding to the installed kernel. Same thing with a
>
Hi,
I’d like to amend this wishlist bug report. I’d find it very useful to
have a linux-doc-2.6 meta package automatically pulling in the latest
-doc package, corresponding to the installed kernel. Same thing with a
linux-source-2.6 meta packages.
Are there any issues with this approach? Or is it
7 matches
Mail list logo