On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 08:54:59PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Quoting "Robert Millan [ackstorm]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 09:13:37AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> >>
> >>> Any news on this? The patch works pretty well for me. Is etch
> >>going to release
> >>> wit
Hi!
> The second of the two patch blocks is inside an #if 0 ... #endif
> block. What's the point of it then? Why not just delete the entire
> block?
I was wondering about this too, when I applied the patch - the second
part just moves the last two lines into this #if 0 block (ie. removes
them,
Quoting "Robert Millan [ackstorm]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 09:13:37AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Any news on this? The patch works pretty well for me. Is etch
going to release
> with 1.1, or with 1.0 ? If 1.0 is being released it better not be
unpatched..
The patc
On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 09:13:37AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
>
> > Any news on this? The patch works pretty well for me. Is etch going to
> > release
> > with 1.1, or with 1.0 ? If 1.0 is being released it better not be
> > unpatched..
>
> The patch is applied to xserver 1.1.1.
xserver 1.1
> Any news on this? The patch works pretty well for me. Is etch going to
> release
> with 1.1, or with 1.0 ? If 1.0 is being released it better not be unpatched..
The patch is applied to xserver 1.1.1.
The second of the two patch blocks is inside an #if 0 ... #endif
block. What's the point
Hi!
Any news on this? The patch works pretty well for me. Is etch going to release
with 1.1, or with 1.0 ? If 1.0 is being released it better not be unpatched..
--
Robert Millan
ACK STORM, S.L. - http://www.ackstorm.es
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "un
6 matches
Mail list logo