Hi,
> > Okay, my answer to that will be:
> >
> > that will introduce a plethora of problems including
> >
> > 1. sort order depends on user's locale
> >
> > 2. backup file names (~,.bak,$$$) need to be handled
> >
> > 3. version control file names (,v .git {arch}) need to be handled
>
> Uh, t
> Okay, my answer to that will be:
>
> that will introduce a plethora of problems including
>
> 1. sort order depends on user's locale
>
> 2. backup file names (~,.bak,$$$) need to be handled
>
> 3. version control file names (,v .git {arch}) need to be handled
Uh, then why is it so easy for s
Hi,
> Maybe I am missing part of your question, but what I had in mind, as
> originally requested in the bug report, is:
>
>"It is already standard to prefix patches with a number corresponding
>to the order in which they should be applied. All of dpatch's
>functionality could be supp
3 matches
Mail list logo
