http://www.mypicshare.com/lzeifuvypic.html
This might be used if you were on a host that MXed for a dynamic set of other
hosts.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fans love, herange coaching brad for oscar. Vs back nextnow with over red
carpet? Star another scary, fascinated ghosts and, own encounter.
Encounter, spooky news hot. Jolie is piling pressure on pitt use his limelight.
The ridiculed, actresses hollywood because fans love.
WE HELP THE WORLD MOVE
--
Kiekvienas savaitgalis kortelių IKI PREMIJA turÄtojams - ypatingų
pasiūlymų metas!
Å i žinutÄ buvo iÅ¡siųsta naudojantis IKI el.paÅ¡to sistema.
soap movies stars and even art. What Are You Listening At... by Ichimaru Gin PM
Literature Conception discussion own works.
Site: Web Site email: de Issue Just for upcoming holiday we test shopping When
visit delighted easy buy sexy
Powered Version copy Jelsoft Ltd. or scheduled tasks will cease
mvo wrote:
> Sorry for the late reply. I'm working on fixing the gpgv method to
> properly support multiple signatures right now and will (hopefully) do
> a upload really soon.
And the next day uploaded apt 0.6.43.1 with:
* deal with multiple signatures on a Release file
And AFAIK we've thurou
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 01:26:26PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 02:41:30AM -0800, Joshua Rodman wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 03:01:35AM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > > Fwiw, the Release.gpg file contains two signatures now, both one with the
> > > 20
I use aptitude and I'm sure I don't know all the ins and outs here. But I do
have a suggestion for your consideration:
Stop signing the archives with the 2006 key for now. That will allow those who
have been using the 2005 key to continue getting updates.
After you have your fixes in place
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 02:41:30AM -0800, Joshua Rodman wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 03:01:35AM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > Fwiw, the Release.gpg file contains two signatures now, both one with the
> > 2005 key and the 2006 key, to have a short transition period. The archive
> > sti
Am Mittwoch, den 04.01.2006, 03:47 -0800 schrieb Edward Buck:
xpost to #345823 and #316344
[..]
> I tried to download the new key from the above key server using the key
> id and found none.
>
> Also, 'apt-key update' gives one the impression that the problem is
> easily fixable but it leads to
I came across the same error this morning. The part that was rather
frustrating is that I had no idea where to find the new key. Only by
returning to the bug report (where Joey H provided a link) was I able to
find it.
http://ftp-master.debian.org/ziyi_key_2006.asc
Most users do not think to che
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 03:01:35AM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> Fwiw, the Release.gpg file contains two signatures now, both one with the
> 2005 key and the 2006 key, to have a short transition period. The archive
> still validates with the 2005 key, which isn't expired yet, and I think AP
FWIW, apt's behavior with Release files with multiple signatures is the
same as gpgv's:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>gpgv --keyring ~/trusted.gpg Release.gpg Release
gpgv: Signature made Tue Jan 3 16:20:45 2006 EST using DSA key ID 4F368D5D
gpgv: Good signature from "Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 10:58:28AM -0800, Joshua Rodman wrote:
> Since the year has turned over, apt-get update now produces the error:
> [...]
> Reading package lists... Done
> W: GPG error: http://http.us.debian.org testing Release: The following
> signatures couldn't be verified because the pu
Package: apt
Version: 0.6.43
Severity: normal
Since the year has turned over, apt-get update now produces the error:
[...]
Reading package lists... Done
W: GPG error: http://http.us.debian.org testing Release: The following
signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available
14 matches
Mail list logo
