On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 06:59:05AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > A patch-stamp will give you a little gain, but really little because quilt
> > maintains a whole bunch of status. It knows where it stands in the patch set
> > at every time. Try to travel into the .pc directory if you want to v
> A patch-stamp will give you a little gain, but really little because quilt
> maintains a whole bunch of status. It knows where it stands in the patch set
> at every time. Try to travel into the .pc directory if you want to visit it.
So, Steve, do you think I can commit the change?
--
To UN
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 08:16:25AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> > > -configure: patch-stamp configure-stamp
> > > +configure: patch configure-stamp
> > > configure-stamp:
> > > dh_testdir
> >
> > I haven't worked with quilt enough yet to know the answer to this: is there
> > not an adva
> > -configure: patch-stamp configure-stamp
> > +configure: patch configure-stamp
> > configure-stamp:
> > dh_testdir
>
> I haven't worked with quilt enough yet to know the answer to this: is there
> not an advantage to having a patch-stamp with quilt? I.e., does quilt store
> enough state
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 10:06:20AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> diff -Nru debian.old/rules debian/rules
> --- debian.old/rules 2006-01-02 09:59:47.312854758 +0100
> +++ debian/rules 2006-01-02 09:29:53.215082689 +0100
> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
>INSTALL += -s
> endif
>
> +include /usr/s
> Indeed, I was just working on the switch to quilt...:-)
>
> Here's a first patch.
No more comments? So, will someone scream out if I happen to apply
this patch?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There's a small error in my patch :
--- rules.old 2006-01-02 12:23:45.436501110 +0100
+++ rules 2006-01-02 11:57:26.028735838 +0100
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@
touch configure-stamp
-build: patch-stamp configure-stamp build-stamp
+build: configure-stamp build-stamp
build-stamp:
d
Am Montag, den 02.01.2006, 08:53 +0100 schrieb Christian Perrier:
> > Switching to dpatch would give me hives. OTOH, switching to quilt might be
> > worth considering, precisely because it gives a better toolset for fuzzies
> > and patch dependencies.
>
> I fully agree here.
> Now we need to fin
> Switching to dpatch would give me hives. OTOH, switching to quilt might be
> worth considering, precisely because it gives a better toolset for fuzzies
> and patch dependencies.
I fully agree here.
I use quilt in shadow and geneweb and it makes life *very* comfortable
(though I don't actually
severity 345557 minor
thanks
On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 08:26:39PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> Package: samba
> Version: 3.0.21a-1
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
> Checked the new Debian version. If one have a look at the build-file
> you will see many hunks and fuzzes applying the patches.
Package: samba
Version: 3.0.21a-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Checked the new Debian version. If one have a look at the build-file
you will see many hunks and fuzzes applying the patches. Please find
attached patch made of completely reworked single patches. Note: The
number of original patches d
11 matches
Mail list logo
