Hi beamer people,
Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 01:06 +0200, Micha Feigin wrote:
>> On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 13:14:49 +0100
>> Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > Thanks. Just as Frank I can't reproduce your problem with the testfile
>> > you provided.
reassign 344790 beamer
thanks
Hi beamer people,
Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 01:06 +0200, Micha Feigin wrote:
>> On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 13:14:49 +0100
>> Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > Thanks. Just as Frank I can't reproduce your problem with t
On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 01:06 +0200, Micha Feigin wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 13:14:49 +0100
> Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Thanks. Just as Frank I can't reproduce your problem with the testfile
> > you provided. Comparing the log files, the main difference I have found
> > up to
On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 13:14:49 +0100
Ralf Stubner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 01:50 +0200, Micha Feigin wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:34:17 +0100
> > Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Well, we still need the output of \listfiles - or maybe just send the
>
On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 01:50 +0200, Micha Feigin wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:34:17 +0100
> Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Well, we still need the output of \listfiles - or maybe just send the
> > complete logfile as an attachment, it shouldn't be too big.
> >
>
> attached
Tha
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:34:17 +0100
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> If you add
> >>
> >> \listfiles
> >>
> >> as the very first line of the LaTeX file, the log file and the output
> >> will contain a list of included style files with versi
Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If you add
>>
>> \listfiles
>>
>> as the very first line of the LaTeX file, the log file and the output
>> will contain a list of included style files with versions. Please send
>> us this list. Also, above the list you can find the listing of all
>>
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 12:59:55 +0100
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Micha,
>
> please keep the bugnumber in the Cc, so that the other maintainers also
> see the mail, and it gets properly archived.
>
Sorry mixed up reply and reply all
> Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
Hi Micha,
please keep the bugnumber in the Cc, so that the other maintainers also
see the mail, and it gets properly archived.
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I attached a sample file. If you change the tocdepth value from 1 to 2 the
> bookmarks are one level behind the table of conten
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:27:45 +0100
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > hyperref uses tocdepth to decide the depth of the bookmarks generated
> > from the document sections. The problem is that with documents that
> > don't
Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hyperref uses tocdepth to decide the depth of the bookmarks generated
> from the document sections. The problem is that with documents that
> don't have a chapter section this causes an off by one error.
>
> Setting tocdepth to 1 to have only sections in t
Package: tetex-extra
Version: 3.0-11
Severity: minor
hyperref uses tocdepth to decide the depth of the bookmarks generated
from the document sections. The problem is that with documents that
don't have a chapter section this causes an off by one error.
Setting tocdepth to 1 to have only sections
12 matches
Mail list logo
