On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 01:49:22PM -0800, Ryan Murray wrote:
> important is not RC.
It is RC for a non-release arch and the default porter nmu rules
applies.
> Please do not NMU for just this change. Thank you.
You have 5 days.
Bastian
--
Well, Jim, I'm not much of an actor either.
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 08:51:07PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> This bug make the build result unreliable. Also it is built on s390
It doesn't make it "unreliable".
> which don't have any x server available and the only usefull variant is
> xdmcp, it is RC buggy for this arch.
important is not
tags 344696 patch
thanks
The nmu diff.
Bastian
--
Humans do claim a great deal for that particular emotion (love).
-- Spock, "The Lights of Zetar", stardate 5725.6
diff -u gdm-2.8.0.6/debian/changelog gdm-2.8.0.6/debian/changelog
--- gdm-2.8.0.6/debian/changelog
+++ gdm-2.8.0.6/
severity 344696 important
thanks
This bug make the build result unreliable. Also it is built on s390
which don't have any x server available and the only usefull variant is
xdmcp, it is RC buggy for this arch.
Bastian
--
I'm a soldier, not a diplomat. I can only tell the truth.
Package: gdm
Version: 2.8.0.6-2
Followup-For: Bug #344696
gdm should include libxdmcp-dev as build-dep in order to include support
for it.
thanks,
Rudy
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable
Package: gdm
Version: 2.8.0.6-2
Followup-For: Bug #344696
The configure shell script doesnt precise the xdmcp switch, so support
is included only if libxdmcp-dev is present. If libxdmcp-dev is present,
a package rebuilt works correctly.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Package: gdm
Version: 2.8.0.6-2
Severity: normal
Hi, GDM is linked to libxdmcp6 only for i386. Is there a
specific reason for that? I was using it on a headless x86 box
for serving diskless X terminals, and after upgrading the box to amd64,
I can't do it anymore (at least not with gdm). :-(
estia
7 matches
Mail list logo
