Hallo! Du (Ingo Juergensmann) hast geschrieben:
> $arch would be m68k, so the new list would be debian-users-m68k instead of
> debian-users-68k. Or do you intend to keep the traditional naming scheme of
> *-68k? If you stay with $arch it would be more logical and maybe less
> confusing to use *-m6
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 04:26:46PM -0600, Cord Beermann wrote:
> comments?
Woo hoo! (enthusiastic support)
Thanks,
Stephen
--
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 04:26:46PM -0600, Cord Beermann wrote:
*bummer* forgot one thing:
> Listmasters prefer the latter idea, because debian-$arch is generally
> the porters-Mailinglist.
> therefore we would add a debian-users-68k mailinglist, and would
> invite all debian-68k subscribers to j
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 04:26:46PM -0600, Cord Beermann wrote:
> We just discussed the debian-68k -problem. in Bug#344551 Wouter
> Verhelst requested a debian-68k-build mailinglist.
> He also added the thought that the maybe nicer approach would be to
> add an debian-68k-users mailinglist.
> Listm
Hi.
We just discussed the debian-68k -problem. in Bug#344551 Wouter
Verhelst requested a debian-68k-build mailinglist.
He also added the thought that the maybe nicer approach would be to
add an debian-68k-users mailinglist.
Listmasters prefer the latter idea, because debian-$arch is generally
th
5 matches
Mail list logo
