Bug#342943: [Secure-testing-team] Re: Bug#342943: only kronolith2 fixed

2006-01-29 Thread Neil McGovern
On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 09:23:31PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: > Neil McGovern wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 11:35:15AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: > > > Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > > > > I've tried to backport the upstream patch for kronolith 2, but most > > > > files touched don't actually

Bug#342943: [Secure-testing-team] Re: Bug#342943: only kronolith2 fixed

2006-01-28 Thread Martin Schulze
Neil McGovern wrote: > On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 11:35:15AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: > > Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > > > I've tried to backport the upstream patch for kronolith 2, but most > > > files touched don't actually exist in kronolith 1, as well as a > > > sizeable part of the code touche

Bug#342943: [Secure-testing-team] Re: Bug#342943: only kronolith2 fixed

2006-01-22 Thread Florian Weimer
* Martin Schulze: > I've taken a look at the patch, and several lines contain changes not > suitable for a security update, i.e. fix different potential bugs or > change the code. I'm attaching the patch. More eyes checking would > be appreciated. This one seems only safe when magic_quotes_gpc

Bug#342943: [Secure-testing-team] Re: Bug#342943: only kronolith2 fixed

2006-01-22 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
Neil McGovern wrote: > A fairly odd bug. It only affects the app if REGISTER_GLOBALS is on, > however, the app requires REGISTER_GLOBALS :| Isn't this in and of itself a problem due to CVE-2005-3390. Is that finally going to be fixed in Sarge? http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3366

Bug#342943: [Secure-testing-team] Re: Bug#342943: only kronolith2 fixed

2006-01-22 Thread Neil McGovern
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 11:35:15AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: > Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > > I've tried to backport the upstream patch for kronolith 2, but most > > files touched don't actually exist in kronolith 1, as well as a > > sizeable part of the code touched in the files that do exist. H