On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 17:54:42 +, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> - Did you try the debian-hppa list whether there are hppa porters
> willing to work on this? When dealing with arch-specific issues, they
> should at least be informed so that they can make a choice between
> dropping sup
On Wed, Jan 4, 2006 at 00:54:38 +, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> Please do, porters should at least be informed, and get a chance to
> comment, and to fix the issue at hand.
>
Agreed, and mailed debian-hppa:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-hppa/2006/01/msg7.html
> > I don't think these
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 04:03:08PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 17:54:42 +, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
>
> > Two questions:
> > - Did you try the debian-hppa list whether there are hppa porters
> > willing to work on this? When dealing with arch-specific issues, t
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 17:54:42 +, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> Two questions:
> - Did you try the debian-hppa list whether there are hppa porters
> willing to work on this? When dealing with arch-specific issues, they
> should at least be informed so that they can make a choice between
tags 342704 moreinfo
thanks
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 01:48:00PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Hi ftpmasters,
>
> the ocaml native compilers on hppa don't build anymore, and upstream
> said:
> "This is due to architectural limitations of HPPA. Too hard to fix
> without control of the linker,
> an
reassign 342704 ftp.debian.org
severity 342704 important
retitle 342704 RM: ocaml:ocaml-native-compilers [hppa] -- RoM; ANAIS;
unsupported upstream
kthxbye
Hi ftpmasters,
the ocaml native compilers on hppa don't build anymore, and upstream
said:
"This is due to architectural limitations of HPPA.
6 matches
Mail list logo
