Bug#341675: qt-x11-free build fails

2006-01-07 Thread Grant Grundler
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 01:05:11AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Grant, thank you for your work to date on this bug. (BTW, it would be > helpful if you would follow up to bug #342545 on libgcc2, instead of bug > #341675 which is filed against just one of the many packages affected by > it). Stev

Bug#341675: qt-x11-free build fails

2006-01-07 Thread Steve Langasek
Grant, thank you for your work to date on this bug. (BTW, it would be helpful if you would follow up to bug #342545 on libgcc2, instead of bug #341675 which is filed against just one of the many packages affected by it). Unfortunately, it doesn't seem from the bug log as though much progress is b

Bug#341675: qt-x11-free build fails

2006-01-02 Thread Grant Grundler
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 06:56:34PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: ... > It would be nice if somebody fluent with hppa assembly can tell us if > > fldw -10(,sp),fr23 > > is a valid instruction or not. Aurelien, gdb may not be decoding the instruction correctly. Shouldn't the target of "word"

Bug#341675: qt-x11-free build fails

2005-12-28 Thread Grant Grundler
On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 02:04:44AM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > Rather than debugging this by remote control, you might find it > easier to simply run "uic" yourself. Obtain the sources for > cppunit (e.g. by "apt-get source cppunit) then do: > > cd src/qttestrunner > /usr/share/qt3/

Bug#341675: qt-x11-free build fails

2005-12-27 Thread Steve M. Robbins
Dear Grant, On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 12:27:59AM -0700, Grant Grundler wrote: > Can you provide more context around the offending insn? > 10 lines of asm before and after the SIGILL instruction? > And possibly a register dump just before the SIGILL is issued? > It would be interesting to know what

Bug#341675: qt-x11-free build fails

2005-12-24 Thread Grant Grundler
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 06:56:34PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: ... > and now the problem is a SIGILL that > occurs a few instructions later when calling __umoddi3 from > libgcc_s.so.2. ... > It would be nice if somebody fluent with hppa assembly can tell us if > > fldw -10(,sp),fr23 > >

Bug#341675: qt-x11-free build fails

2005-12-19 Thread Steve Langasek
reassign 341675 libgcc2 4.0.2-5 thanks On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 06:56:34PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 02:41:49AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > This is a bug that was believed fixed previously, but it is *not* bug > > #326581; it's bug #333766, which was fixed in glibc

Bug#341675: qt-x11-free build fails

2005-12-18 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 02:41:49AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > This is a bug that was believed fixed previously, but it is *not* bug > #326581; it's bug #333766, which was fixed in glibc 2.3.5-7. (And it really > was fixed, otherwise kdelibs4c2 wouldn't be in testing right now for hppa.) > But