Bug#340713: Further example

2006-09-12 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Don Armstrong wrote: As reported in #339141 and #326774 this is not true since a long time. (This is my most hated and probably most boring bug at all.) Yeah, it's one that needs to be fixed; since it doesn't really affect all that much I haven't bothered to spend time to

Bug#340713: Further example

2006-09-12 Thread Don Armstrong
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Don Armstrong wrote: > > >The archive flag is totally wrong; actually archived bugs only show up > >when you use archive=yes. > > As reported in #339141 and #326774 this is not true since a long time. > (This is my most hated and pr

Bug#340713: Further example

2006-09-11 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Don Armstrong wrote: The archive flag is totally wrong; actually archived bugs only show up when you use archive=yes. As reported in #339141 and #326774 this is not true since a long time. (This is my most hated and probably most boring bug at all.) I've been working on

Bug#340713: Further example

2006-09-11 Thread Don Armstrong
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Andreas Tille wrote: > I just observed an effekt that seems to be related to this Problem. > Bug #381140 is listed as "Outstanding" even if it was archived. The archive flag is totally wrong; actually archived bugs only show up when you use archive=yes. > BTW, is there any s

Bug#340713: Further example

2006-09-11 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I just observed an effekt that seems to be related to this Problem. Bug #381140 is listed as "Outstanding" even if it was archived. BTW, is there any sign that somebody is working on the long standing and very boring bugs of bugs.debian.org? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-t