Bug#340354: lsh-utils

2005-11-27 Thread Stefan Pfetzing
Hi, yup, this will ease the packaging of lsh-utils. Anyhow, I doubt the source package name will change, it will most probably stay I guess. I already have a (nearly) ready new version of lsh-utils which conflicts against lsh (so people who have the old lsh still installed don't get error

Bug#340354: lsh-utils should be renamed to lsh

2005-11-22 Thread Simon Law
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 05:36:33PM -0500, Charles Fry wrote: > Package: lsh-utils > Version: should be renamed to lsh > Severity: wishlist > > Per bug #338763 the previous lsh package has now been removed from the > Debian archive. > > Now, after all the trouble you've been through not to conflic

Bug#340354: lsh-utils should be renamed to lsh

2005-11-22 Thread Charles Fry
Package: lsh-utils Version: should be renamed to lsh Severity: wishlist Per bug #338763 the previous lsh package has now been removed from the Debian archive. Now, after all the trouble you've been through not to conflict with it, it is gone and (as far as I can tell) you should be able to step i