also sprach Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.02.10.1216 +0100]:
> You could always try again to double check...
echo From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | sendmail -f [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
... the mail arrived @debian.org. So it seems you are right. I think
my previous confusion may have
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 02:26:41AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.02.10.0213 +0100]:
> > I don't understand what you mean. I tried subscribing to a bug with
> > different From envelope and From: header lines, and lists.debian.org
> > replied to
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 11:13:02PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.02.09.1944 +0100]:
> > > This did not work for me.
> >
> > Really? What exactly did you do? It worked for me.
>
> Let's see what happens then. :)
I don't understand what you mea
also sprach Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.02.10.0213 +0100]:
> I don't understand what you mean. I tried subscribing to a bug with
> different From envelope and From: header lines, and lists.debian.org
> replied to the From: header line, not the envelope-from address.
Okay; I did the sa
also sprach Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.02.09.1944 +0100]:
> > This did not work for me.
>
> Really? What exactly did you do? It worked for me.
Let's see what happens then. :)
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian developer and author: http://deb
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 09:18:14AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.02.09.0009 +0100]:
> > Have checked: the BTS/lists.d.o pays attention to the From: line and
> > ignores the Envelope-From, so we can just use plain old sendmail and
> > not worry a
also sprach Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.02.09.0009 +0100]:
> Have checked: the BTS/lists.d.o pays attention to the From: line and
> ignores the Envelope-From, so we can just use plain old sendmail and
> not worry about munging anything.
This did not work for me.
--
.''`. martin
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 08:50:26PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> > Also, many users won't be able to run /usr/sbin/sendmail -f, so that's
> > not helpful. If the subscription system can't handle faked From:
> > lines, then we're stuffed.
>
> Yeah. I just found a better means!
>
> [EMAIL PROT
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 08:50:26PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.02.08.2037 +0100]:
> > I don't understand why you've introduced this $btsserver variable in
> > all of the initial variables. If we want the bts script to be usuable
> > on other
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 02:41:28PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> tags 339661 + patch
> thanks
>
> Here's the patch. Note, I am not a perl dude. I did test the
> functionality, but you never know. However, it integrates well, the
> un/subscribe commands can be used together with others (separate
also sprach Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.02.08.2037 +0100]:
> I don't understand why you've introduced this $btsserver variable in
> all of the initial variables. If we want the bts script to be usuable
> on other servers, we could do that, but then we'd need to introduce a
> command-li
tags 339661 + patch
thanks
Here's the patch. Note, I am not a perl dude. I did test the
functionality, but you never know. However, it integrates well, the
un/subscribe commands can be used together with others (separate
mails will be sent), but I don't vouch for it.
Have fun,
diff -Nru /tmp/sIw
12 matches
Mail list logo
