Bug#339141: There are some unarchived bugs left

2007-07-03 Thread Don Armstrong
On Tue, 03 Jul 2007, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Don Armstrong wrote: > >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/version.cgi?package=phylip;found=phylip%2F1%3A3.6.1-2;fixed=phylip%2F1%3A3.65-1;info=1 >> >> phylip 1:3.6.1-2 is still buggy and is in unstable and testing. > > Perhaps this is b

Bug#339141: There are some unarchived bugs left

2007-07-03 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Don Armstrong wrote: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/version.cgi?package=phylip;found=phylip%2F1%3A3.6.1-2;fixed=phylip%2F1%3A3.65-1;info=1 phylip 1:3.6.1-2 is still buggy and is in unstable and testing. Perhaps this is because of the missing mipsel package according to

Bug#339141: There are some unarchived bugs left

2007-07-02 Thread Don Armstrong
On Tue, 03 Jul 2007, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > while I observed that many bugs from > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > were archived therer were some of them actually remaining which > are not marked by "Can be archived in ?? days." These are bugs > that are fixe

Bug#339141: There are some unarchived bugs left

2007-07-02 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, while I observed that many bugs from http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED] were archived therer were some of them actually remaining which are not marked by "Can be archived in ?? days." These are bugs that are fixed for a long time. I see no system why most of the closed b