On 12/6/05, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
clone 338457 -1unmerge -1submitter -1 Popcorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>retitle -1 samba: segfault after upgradereassign -1 samba 3.0.20b-2+b1thanks
Unfortunately, the backtraces made with samba-dbg installed point to a stackcorruption problem (as did
clone 338457 -1
unmerge -1
submitter -1 Popcorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
retitle -1 samba: segfault after upgrade
reassign -1 samba 3.0.20b-2+b1
thanks
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 12:00:52AM +0100, Popcorn wrote:
> okay, if that's all, then I got a couple more backtraces in the
> attached *.gz file. I th
Could you also send your smb.conf file ?
No need to CC me to answers, btw
mbox.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
okay, if that's all, then I got a couple more backtraces in the
attached *.gz file. I think one or two of them is without samba-dbg but
there are also a couple with it. I hope that you guys can use it. if
not, let me know and I will *kill* my samba again :)
On 12/1/05, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL
Quoting Popcorn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> So tell me more about this samba-dbg package. And after I install it, what do
> I
> need to do anything with it in order to give you a backtrace that can be used?
Nothing special.
> How do I know that a backtrace is usable? Sorry to be asking a bunch of
>
So tell me more about this samba-dbg package. And after I install it, what do I need to do anything with it in order to give you a backtrace that can be used? How do I know that a backtrace is usable? Sorry to be asking a bunch of questions, but I don't seem to be having much luck in finding this
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 12:48:52AM +0100, Popcorn wrote:
> I was unable to reproduce the error today. I will keep trying to reproduce
> this if I can, and if I can, I will install samba-dbg and see what I can
> gather.
You would want to install samba-dbg *first*, so that if you only get one
more
I was unable to reproduce the error today. I will keep trying to
reproduce this if I can, and if I can, I will install samba-dbg and see
what I can gather.
thanks
LanceOn 11/28/05, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 10:11:22PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:> Quoti
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 10:11:22PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Popcorn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > yes, yes I do think its a bit scarce. I seem to have "missused" the
> > reportbug
> > tool. Is this a bit better? As you may have guessed this is my first bug
> > report. I hope it is m
I will try to reproduce this tomorrow. On 11/27/05, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quoting Popcorn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):> yes, yes I do think its a bit scarce. I seem to have "missused" the reportbug
> tool. Is this a bit better? As you may have guessed this is my first bug> report.
Quoting Popcorn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> yes, yes I do think its a bit scarce. I seem to have "missused" the reportbug
> tool. Is this a bit better? As you may have guessed this is my first bug
> report. I hope it is more helpful this time. if you need any other infos.
> Let me know, I would be
- Forwarded message from Popcorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 20:49:43 +0100
From: Popcorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#338457: samba: segfault after upgrade
yes, yes I do think its a bit scarce. I seem
Quoting lance chatwell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: samba
> Version: 3.0.20b-2+b1
> Followup-For: Bug #338457
>
>
>
Don't you think this bug is a little bit scarce? :-)
Package: samba
Version: 3.0.20b-2+b1
Followup-For: Bug #338457
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (
14 matches
Mail list logo
