Bug#338405: another patch

2006-12-31 Thread Russell Coker
On Sunday 31 December 2006 23:47, maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > as you agree that the busybox utitilites are not functional ident, > i queue that patch for postetch. there should be enough time to poke > new busybox upstream to merge such patches. OK, post-etch will do. I'll wri

Bug#338405: another patch

2006-12-31 Thread maximilian attems
On Sun, 31 Dec 2006, Russell Coker wrote: > On Sunday 31 December 2006 20:33, maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > Such things of course will be less likely to be found if there is no easy > option of creating an initramfs that uses it. The last patch that I sent > will give no di

Bug#338405: another patch

2006-12-31 Thread Russell Coker
On Sunday 31 December 2006 20:33, maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > well the patch description is different to the patch itself. > kinit is not used in initramfs-tools and is not removed in > the patch below, what you remove are dash and minips from klibc-utils. Sorry for the mis-des

Bug#338405: another patch

2006-12-31 Thread maximilian attems
tags 338405 wontfix stop On Sun, 31 Dec 2006, Russell Coker wrote: > The attached patch creates a new config option ONLY_BUSYBOX which can be set > if you want to use busybox instead of kinit. It saves over 200K of > compressed size on my system. > > I believe that this should be included, it

Bug#338405: another patch

2006-12-30 Thread Russell Coker
The attached patch creates a new config option ONLY_BUSYBOX which can be set if you want to use busybox instead of kinit. It saves over 200K of compressed size on my system. I believe that this should be included, it doesn't stop kinit being used, merely provides another option. --- /usr/sbin/

Bug#338405: another patch for busybox support

2006-12-02 Thread maximilian attems
On Sat, 02 Dec 2006, Russell Coker wrote: > The following will significantly reduce the size of an initramfs when busybox > is used while also enabling all busybox commands (handy if you have an option > to run a shell from the initramfs for recovery). In spite of what maks > thinks, the busyb

Bug#338405: another patch for busybox support

2006-12-01 Thread Russell Coker
The following will significantly reduce the size of an initramfs when busybox is used while also enabling all busybox commands (handy if you have an option to run a shell from the initramfs for recovery). In spite of what maks thinks, the busybox option is still there, so it should be made to w