On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 22:08 +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> The official client did around the time I filed this bug, so this bug
> is entirely valid.
This seems to say
otherwise: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080407130451AAiwAoy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 9:17 PM, Ari Pollak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 20:43 +0300, =?UTF-8?Q? Martin-=C3=89ric?= Racine
> wrote:
>> Around the same time, I still had access to Windows hosts.
>
> That's not what I asked. If you can't answer whether the official client
> can
On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 20:43 +0300, =?UTF-8?Q? Martin-=C3=89ric?= Racine
wrote:
> Around the same time, I still had access to Windows hosts.
That's not what I asked. If you can't answer whether the official client
can display part of a line formatted a certain way, then I'm going to
assume this is
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Ari Pollak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
Did you find out what upstream requested, specifically whether the
official client can do what you're asking?
>>
>> Last time I used Windows, several years ago, it did.
>>
>
> This bug repor
Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
>>> Did you find out what upstream requested, specifically whether the
>>> official client can do what you're asking?
>
> Last time I used Windows, several years ago, it did.
>
This bug report is several years old; does that mean you used the Windows
client to do what
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 7:17 AM, Ari Pollak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
>> Thanks for the forward. I really never saw this one before. Must have
>> gone to the spam filter.
>
> You still didn't answer this one:
>
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Ari Pollak <[EMAIL PROTE
Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> Thanks for the forward. I really never saw this one before. Must have
> gone to the spam filter.
You still didn't answer this one:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Ari Pollak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did you find out what upstream requested, specifically whether th
Thanks for the forward. I really never saw this one before. Must have
gone to the spam filter.
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Ari Pollak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
>> I never received such a request.
>>
>
> From: Luke Schierer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Martin-Éric Rac
I never received such a request.
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Ari Pollak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did you find out what upstream requested, specifically whether the
> official client can do what you're asking?
>
> Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
>> reassign 337814 pidgin
>> thanks
>>
>> Greeting
Did you find out what upstream requested, specifically whether the
official client can do what you're asking?
Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> reassign 337814 pidgin
> thanks
>
> Greetings,
>
> We're well into Pidgin 2.x series and I notice that this regression
> still hasn't been fixed. Could the bu
reassign 337814 pidgin
thanks
Greetings,
We're well into Pidgin 2.x series and I notice that this regression
still hasn't been fixed. Could the bug report be forwarded to
upstream, at least?
--
Martin-Éric Racine
http://q-funk.iki.fi
11 matches
Mail list logo
