Bug#337570: apparent gcc4 regression in xprint on powerpc

2005-11-10 Thread Felix C. Stegerman
On 2005-11-09 19:44:27, Drew Parsons wrote: > One of the users (Felix, cc:d here) is attempting to build Xprt himself > so we'll hear what his success is (he needs a fresh binary to get > unstripped symbols so we can obtain a backtrace from gdb). I'm compiling it now ... Felix P.S. I seem to b

Bug#337570: apparent gcc4 regression in xprint on powerpc

2005-11-09 Thread Falk Hueffner
Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Current gcc is 4.0.2-1. Is the segfault in xprint -12 something you > might expect to occur, and would a rebuilt with gcc 4.0.2 be likely to > repair it? Not very likely, but it should definitely be done before trying anything else. Trying gcc-snapshot w

Bug#337570: apparent gcc4 regression in xprint on powerpc

2005-11-09 Thread Drew Parsons
Dear powerpc and gcc developers, some Xprint users have reported a segfault in Xprt ( bug #337570, http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=337570). running on powerpc. They report it occurs with xprint 0.1.0.alpha1-12, but not with -11 or -10. Checking the build logs at http://buildd.de