Package: subversion
Version: 1.2.3dfsg1-3
Severity: grave
G'day.
I have run into a problem where I can't commit a change to my subversion
repository via HTTP/SSL.
The problem seems identical to the one described in this bug report, but
my issues continue despite running the version that claims t
Hi,
On Wed, 9 Nov 2005 06:00:01 -0600
Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you please retest with my packages at
> http://p12n.org/tmp/svn-336373/ ?
I've tested them, and I've been able to import the whole uClibc source
code through https:// without any problem (while it was previous
[Sven-Haegar Koch]
> Having had the same problem, your test-packages recompiled locally
> (just decreased the version number, I want the official one to
> upgrade the test one when its released) fixes it for me.
Great! We'll close the bug on the next upload, then, unless Thomas
reports that this
Peter Samuelson wrote:
I came up with several ways around this - the latest is to use
libneon24 but *not* link libssl0.9.8. There was never any reason for
us to link to openssl at all; this was a packaging bug.
Can you please retest with my packages at
http://p12n.org/tmp/svn-336373/ ?
Havin
[Peter Samuelson]
> Oh, doh! /usr/bin/svn will not use libneon25, so that accomplished
> nothing.
I came up with several ways around this - the latest is to use
libneon24 but *not* link libssl0.9.8. There was never any reason for
us to link to openssl at all; this was a packaging bug.
Can you
[Peter Samuelson]
> Oh, doh! /usr/bin/svn will not use libneon25, so that accomplished
> nothing.
>
> I'll build a new set of packages that use libneon25 instead
Well, now I see why Debian ships both neon24 and neon25. subversion
won't yet compile against neon25, and I don't have the time or
i
[Thomas Petazzoni]
> > Since you have a ready test case for this, can you try the neon
> > package at
> > http://www.barcikacomp.hu/deb/libneon25_0.25.4.dfsg-1_i386.deb, as
> > mentioned in Bug #335574?
>
> With a Debian sid updated yesterday and your package, it still doesn't
> work:
Oh, doh!
Hi,
On Sun, 6 Nov 2005 13:47:01 -0600
Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since you have a ready test case for this, can you try the neon
> package at
> http://www.barcikacomp.hu/deb/libneon25_0.25.4.dfsg-1_i386.deb, as
> mentioned in Bug #335574?
With a Debian sid updated yesterday and
[Thomas Petazzoni]
> Maybe it's a problem around libneon24 (linked against openssl0.9.7)
> and the fact that subversion is linked against openssl 0.9.8.
Since you have a ready test case for this, can you try the neon package
at http://www.barcikacomp.hu/deb/libneon25_0.25.4.dfsg-1_i386.deb, as
me
First, apologies for the delayed response - I didn't get the BTS mail
until the other day, possibly because of the known mail backlog
affecting certain Debian services.
> svn: MKCOL of
> '/svn/thomas/!svn/wrk/b82d4a0a-4a04-0410-8ac2-c33f329d32ff/uclibc-sos/trunk/test/string':
> Could not read sta
Package: subversion
Version: 1.2.3dfsg1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
While trying to import files inside a Subversion repository accessed
through https, I get the following error, fully reproducible (everytime
on the same directory):
svn: MKCOL of
'/svn/thomas/!
11 matches
Mail list logo
