Bug#336245: libpgjava: use upstream package name

2006-04-24 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I'm ok with changing the name to libpostgresql-jdbc-java Comments? - -- .''`. : :' :rnaud `. `' `- Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using

Bug#336245: libpgjava: use upstream package name

2005-10-28 Thread Sanghyeon Seo
On 10/29/05, Wolfgang Baer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > libpgjava is part of sarge and therefore a transitional package > as now exists needs to be kept. We can just rename libpg-java into > libpostgresql-jdbc-java. > > Comments ? According to my table, http://sparcs.kaist.ac.kr/~tinuviel/package/

Bug#336245: libpgjava: use upstream package name

2005-10-28 Thread Wolfgang Baer
Hi Peter, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Package: libpgjava Version: 8.0-312-1 Severity: wishlist As long as you are randomly renaming the package, shouldn't you use the upstream package name? I would not call it randomly - it was a change to comply with java policy ! That would be "postgresql-j

Bug#336245: libpgjava: use upstream package name

2005-10-28 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Package: libpgjava Version: 8.0-312-1 Severity: wishlist As long as you are randomly renaming the package, shouldn't you use the upstream package name? That would be "postgresql-jdbc" so the package should be called libpostgresql-jdbc-java. That would also have the nice side effect that people l