On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 02:24:23PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > > > - ls -l /etc/alternatives | grep vi
> > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 28 2005-06-13 23:55 gvim.1.gz ->
> > > /usr/share/man/man1/vim.1.gz
> > Uhm ... that's mine: the old gvim diversion need to be removed in some
> > preinst. Could
#include
* Stefano Zacchiroli [Tue, Oct 25 2005, 12:47:20PM]:
> [ Of course I asked this information again just a ms before receiving
> your mail, sorry for that ]
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 12:36:13PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > reassign 335502 dpkg
> > thanks
>
> I don't think it worked,
[ Of course I asked this information again just a ms before receiving
your mail, sorry for that ]
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 12:36:13PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> reassign 335502 dpkg
> thanks
I don't think it worked, you did not Cc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Maybe because you did that manually with d
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 11:55:57AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Sorry, was wrong statement. gvim->vim symlink was there, it was just not
> displayed by "which" (obviosly) in the quick test.
Ok, one problem is solved then :-)
What about the other information I asked in the previous post?
--
Stef
reassign 335502 dpkg
thanks
#include
* Stefano Zacchiroli [Tue, Oct 25 2005, 10:44:54AM]:
> tags 335502 + moreinfo unreproducible
> thanks
>
> Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > after todays Sid upgrade the vim installation broke. The new symlinks
> > in /usr/bin to the "alternatives" links were just missi
#include
* Stefano Zacchiroli [Tue, Oct 25 2005, 11:08:31AM]:
> > Info that could help can be:
>
> BTW, about your mention of /usr/bin/gvim in the bug reposrt subject: are
> you really missing /usr/bin/gvim?
>
> That would be really strange since it is not created with
> update-alternatives, but
> Info that could help can be:
BTW, about your mention of /usr/bin/gvim in the bug reposrt subject: are
you really missing /usr/bin/gvim?
That would be really strange since it is not created with
update-alternatives, but is a symlink part of the vim package ...
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Compute
tags 335502 + moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
Eduard Bloch wrote:
> after todays Sid upgrade the vim installation broke. The new symlinks
> in /usr/bin to the "alternatives" links were just missing. I think it
> comes from some internal breakage in update-alternatives, I have seen
> it doing strang
Package: vim-common
Version: 1:6.4-001+2
Severity: normal
Hello,
after todays Sid upgrade the vim installation broke. The new symlinks in
/usr/bin to the "alternatives" links were just missing. I think it comes from
some
internal breakage in update-alternatives, I have seen it doing strange th
9 matches
Mail list logo
