If you really want to keep using htdig 3.1 [...]
Ok, ok, ok, it's time to move on. Sigh...
Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Actually, Debian has never had more than one version of htdig in the
archive. This was 3.1 until my recent upload, which replaced it with
3.2b6. The 3.1 package was hopelessly uninstallable and RC buggy - the
official count didn't take into consideration bugs (like #334698) which
weren't l
Bad move.
Debian uses a separate package for the 3.2 and 3.1 versions due to large
performance difference (3.2 does more, but is much more resource
hungry). Please reopen and mark wontfix.
On Thu, 3 Aug 2006 5:55 pm, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
This is an automatic notification regardi
Hi,
the very same bug is reported in ubuntu, see [1]. The reporter says, that the
issue is fixed with upstream's 3.2.0b6, so I closed the bug in ubuntu.
HTH,
Stefan.
--
[1]: https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/htdig/+bug/35126
pgpJmPWw53YKY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: htdig
Version: 1:3.1.6-11
Severity: normal
Running the AMD64 arch of htdig turns existing
databases into mulch, generating errors like:
BAD TAG IN SERIALIZED DATA: 177
Besides corrupting databases when writing to them,
htsearch can't successfully read a i386 generated
database. Fortunat
5 matches
Mail list logo
