On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 01:03:27PM +, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Do you still have this problem? (segfault when using websec with https
> URLs)
No.
> I've been using websec with an https URL for months now, without any
> problem.
This is wonder. Two years passed.
--
***
tags 334662 + unreproducible
thanks
On 20/10/05 at 17:19 +0400, Vladimir Stavrinov wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 06:18:02PM +0200, Ludovic Drolez wrote:
>
> > It's maybe a bug in perl's LWP::UserAgent since websec uses
> > perl to do its requests. Could you upgrade your perl modules
> > too ?
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 06:18:02PM +0200, Ludovic Drolez wrote:
> It's maybe a bug in perl's LWP::UserAgent since websec uses
> perl to do its requests. Could you upgrade your perl modules
> too ?
I don't upgrade single packet, but hole system do:
apt-get dist-upgrade
Thus all packets are of l
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 10:44:00AM +0400, Vladimir Stavrinov wrote:
> After upgrade libssl0.9.8 from 0.9.8-3 to 0.9.8a-1 websec exit with
> "Segmentation fault" on https urls. Don't know if this is ssl bug or
> websec itself. If You think this is ssl bug, please report to its
> maintainer.
It's ma
Package: websec
Version: 1.8.0-1
Severity: normal
After upgrade libssl0.9.8 from 0.9.8-3 to 0.9.8a-1 websec exit with
"Segmentation fault" on https urls. Don't know if this is ssl bug or
websec itself. If You think this is ssl bug, please report to its
maintainer.
-- System Information:
Debian
5 matches
Mail list logo