Bug#334613: tetex-bin: same problem when upgrade to 3.0.10

2005-11-10 Thread Eddie
Hilmar Preusse wrote: > On 07.11.05 Hilmar Preusse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >>On 05.11.05 Eddie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> >>>Hilmar Preusse wrote: >>> On 03.11.05 Eddie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > Hi, > > >I forgot to mention that the file tetex.postinst.XXgqP8eU was >

Bug#334613: [SPAM?]: Bug#334613: tetex-bin: same problem when upgrade to 3.0.10

2005-11-10 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 10.11.05 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, > > If the user now refuses to replace the local version by that one > > from the maint (which is the default) fmtutil now starts creating > > formats with the old configuration. ---> *bamm* > > T

Bug#334613: [SPAM?]: Bug#334613: tetex-bin: same problem when upgrade to 3.0.10

2005-11-10 Thread Frank Küster
Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In preinst we move the old 00tetex.cnf to 01tetex.cnf. At any time > dpkg comes along and finds out, that 01tetex.cnf has been changed (as > it differs from that one in the package). It's ucf-managed: $ grep fmt.d /var/lib/ucf/hashfile 757459dda86e1bd3

Bug#334613: tetex-bin: same problem when upgrade to 3.0.10

2005-11-10 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 07.11.05 Hilmar Preusse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On 05.11.05 Eddie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Hilmar Preusse wrote: > > > On 03.11.05 Eddie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi, > > >> I forgot to mention that the file tetex.postinst.XXgqP8eU was > > >> reproduced by another setup as the orgi

Bug#334613: tetex-bin: same problem when upgrade to 3.0.10

2005-11-07 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 05.11.05 Eddie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hilmar Preusse wrote: > > On 03.11.05 Eddie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >>Hilmar Preusse wrote: > >>>On 24.10.05 Eddie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi, > fmtutil-sys: running `etex -ini -jobname=jadetex -progname=jadetex > &latex jadetex.in

Bug#334613: tetex-bin: same problem when upgrade to 3.0.10

2005-11-05 Thread Eddie
Hilmar Preusse wrote: > On 03.11.05 Eddie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >>Hilmar Preusse wrote: >> >>>On 24.10.05 Eddie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >>> Frank K?ster wrote: >Eddie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > >>Please include this file if you report a bug. > >

Bug#334613: tetex-bin: same problem when upgrade to 3.0.10

2005-11-04 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 03.11.05 Eddie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hilmar Preusse wrote: > > On 24.10.05 Eddie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >>Frank K?ster wrote: > >>>Eddie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, > Please include this file if you report a bug. > >>> > >>>Do you still have the file, or can you reproduce i

Bug#334613: tetex-bin: same problem when upgrade to 3.0.10

2005-11-01 Thread Hilmar Preusse
On 24.10.05 Eddie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Frank K?ster wrote: > > Eddie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, > >>fmtutil failed. Output has been stored in > >>/tmp/tetex.postinst.XXKSxUFW ^^^ This filename differs from the name of the file you sent us (if I assume you

Bug#334613: tetex-bin: same problem when upgrade to 3.0.10

2005-10-24 Thread Frank Küster
Eddie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > fmtutil failed. Output has been stored in > /tmp/tetex.postinst.XXKSxUFW > Please include this file if you report a bug. Do you still have the file, or can you reproduce it, and send it to us? Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich

Bug#334613: tetex-bin: same problem when upgrade to 3.0.10

2005-10-24 Thread Eddie
Package: tetex-bin Version: 3.0-10.1 Followup-For: Bug #334613 The bug#334613 seems remained as the upgrade still failed. fmtutil-sys: Error! Not all formats have been built successfully. Visit the log files in directory /var/lib/texmf/web2c for details. This is a summary of all `failed'