Bug#333907: patch and nmu

2006-07-30 Thread Julien Danjou
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 08:10:12PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Since the bug report was about a FTBFS error in silky, I don't think that > any binNMU is required to fix the bug. The package also seems to have been > picked up automatically by all buildds, so this bug has rightly been closed. I

Bug#333907: patch and nmu

2006-07-30 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 06:14:23PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote: > > The only version of libsilc-1.0-2-dev in the archive seems to be > > 0.9.12-4.2, so the versioned build-dependency makes silky unbuildable. > I just uploaded 0.9.12-4.3 which fix #331630. > So a binNMU of silky should fix #333907

Bug#333907: patch and nmu

2006-07-25 Thread Julien Danjou
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 10:25:50AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: Hello, > The only version of libsilc-1.0-2-dev in the archive seems to be > 0.9.12-4.2, so the versioned build-dependency makes silky unbuildable. I just uploaded 0.9.12-4.3 which fix #331630. So a binNMU of silky should fix #333907

Bug#333907: patch and nmu

2006-07-15 Thread Julien Cristau
reopen 333907 retitle 333907 FTBFS: build-depends on a non-existing package kthxbye On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 23:59:04 -0400, Erinn Clark wrote: > diff -ur 0/silky-0.5.2/debian/control 1/silky-0.5.2/debian/control > --- 0/silky-0.5.2/debian/control 2004-10-10 15:00:32.0 -0400 > +++ 1/s

Bug#333907: patch and nmu

2006-04-27 Thread Erinn Clark
Hi, I've fixed silky's build-deps and NMUed it; an interdiff is attached. Happy birthday, vorlon. ;) -- off the chain like a rebellious guanine nucleotide diff -ur 0/silky-0.5.2/config.guess 1/silky-0.5.2/config.guess --- 0/silky-0.5.2/config.guess 2004-10-10 15:20:42.0 -0400 +++ 1/si