Bug#333160: Requesting change of severity to grave

2006-04-24 Thread Nathan Scott
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 05:01:25PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > Daniel Webb wrote: > > > I'll see if I can dig into nftw() tomorrow if someone else who knows what > > they're doing hasn't already figured this out by then. > > Any progress? Hi Joey, Daniel and I have been talking to Andreas (u

Bug#333160: Requesting change of severity to grave

2006-04-24 Thread Martin Schulze
Daniel Webb wrote: > On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 07:51:53PM +1000, Nathan Scott wrote: > > > Please do... actions speak alot louder than words. > > [I'm CCing security because I already wrote them about this] > > I've never used any of these libraries, so bear with me... > > (looking at the Debian

Bug#333160: Requesting change of severity to grave

2006-04-12 Thread Daniel Webb
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 07:51:53PM +1000, Nathan Scott wrote: > Please do... actions speak alot louder than words. [I'm CCing security because I already wrote them about this] I've never used any of these libraries, so bear with me... (looking at the Debian stable version) setfacl.c line 341:

Bug#333160: Requesting change of severity to grave

2006-04-12 Thread Nathan Scott
Hmm, somehow I don't remember even seeing the original bug report for this one. Shame on me I guess, but I'd have at least passed the report on upstream to Andreas if I'd seen it... not sure what happened there. On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 03:15:34AM -0600, Daniel Webb wrote: > ... > If this is due t

Bug#333160: Requesting change of severity to grave

2006-04-12 Thread Daniel Webb
I found this bug on accident, while using setfacl -R in the same way I was using chmod -R. The behavior should be the same, and the man page describes it as the same, but it isn't. I was fortunate in that I found out when a symbolic link in a user directory pointed to the root partition which doe