On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 11:28:13PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Hmm, are you aware that Xprt *can* already be started by a normal
> user.
Actually that what the point I was making against your point. You
question how enthusiastic some systems would be to have an Xprt instance
running for every sing
On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 14:24 +0200, Christof Douma wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 10:06:50AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > Not useless, only if there's a local user vindictive enough to cause
> > this sort of disruption.
> I have in mind the usual setup on a univerity, school or workplace. It
> i
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 10:06:50AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Not useless, only if there's a local user vindictive enough to cause
> this sort of disruption.
I have in mind the usual setup on a univerity, school or workplace. It
is common to have some malicious users between them. I did not found
On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 18:18 +0200, Christof Douma wrote:
> Disabling Xprt is simple in the default configuration of Debian:
>
> DISPLAY=${XPSERVERLIST% } xhost -LOCAL:
>
> After which Xprt is rendered useless unit root finds out and restart it.
> Until that time users must start their own Xprt s
Package: xprint
Version: 1:0.1.0.alpha1-10
Severity: important
Disabling Xprt is simple in the default configuration of Debian:
DISPLAY=${XPSERVERLIST% } xhost -LOCAL:
After which Xprt is rendered useless unit root finds out and restart it.
Until that time users must start their own Xprt service
5 matches
Mail list logo
